I'm the kind of guy who can appreciate just about any size of boobs. Small or large knockers, so long as the large ones aren't grotesquely huge, are awesome.

But there's such an emphasis on having big breasts. I've seen many women, who looked absolutely fine before, get boob jobs and come away with these abnormal honkers. Have you ever seen them move? They're so stiff and unmovable, like two boulders. Amazingly unnatural.

Why is this considered attractive?

I don't know why guys find them attractive.

They don't do anything, do they? Like built-in Wi-Fi hotspots? Or those nipple-guns from Star Wars?



'Cause that would be cool.

I can appreciate almost all the varying breasts out there, but to be honest, I spend a lot of my time noticing all the lovely larger breasts. I like them to have a bounce in their step and no fake stuff. The fake ones are just feel too unnatural. I could go on but this is a family show.

I don't think they are considered attractive the way they used to be back in the late 80's/early 90's when they were a novelty, but the reason they are still popular is because women use them under clothes to pretend they have naturally large breasts. Fake breasts sometimes are appealing when a women is clothed when you don't know they are fake. It is a power thing. But when they are naked they usually look pretty ridiculous. The sad thing is that no matter what size, natural ALWAYS looks better naked but women are seen by men and other women most of their lives clothed. You don't really see any fake breasts at a nudist colony I don't think.

There's also Austin Power's fembots.

Natural, 100 percent.

I also think woman prefer boob jobs and bigger knockers for...well, more attention. Low self-esteem is a b*tch, ain't it?

Some women get boob jobs for other reasons other than just attention. Besides, what people want to do, people will do. As for me personally, It's all about the proportions of the body. The taller the chick, bigger boobs would look more appealing than short chicks with large breasts. However, the laws of proportionality don't have to necessarily hold up, but if it's way off balance to where it looks weird, then I'm not a fan. I prefer real breasts, but I'm not going to toss a chick to the side just because she had a boob job. It depends.

Second Life is host to a variety of oddly-proportioned folks, including those with abnormally large knockers. Here's a typical example when somebody comes along with an exaggerated chest:


Seriously, when you see a girl with a chest like that, you instinctively think "guy in reality". Because no real girl who knows anything about chest weight would want breasts that size in reality.

I really don't understand the attraction. I mean, for me, I want them for myself (in a respectable size). But the appeal for the typical guy? No idea. My first thought is the attraction is 'cause guys don't have them, too (manboobs are something different), but then there are also lesbians who are also attracted to chests. It's gotta be some subconcious, instinctual attraction.

So long as I've brought up proportions in Second Life, I find it ridiculous when somebody comes along with an abnormally thin waist, too.

It's as simple as this: More than a handful is a waste.

On a guy who doesn't know how to appreciate them.

Actually, I don't like breasts on a guy in the first place. kthx.

And furthermore, I hardly see how preference of size proves or disproves one's appreciation of them.

Yeah. Just means he wishes he had bigger hands.

As for my thoughts on the subject, I don't care a whole lot about the size of a woman's breasts. While it sounds odd, if you show me a big breasted woman then 15 minutes later, one with... less mass in that area I probably couldn't tell you the difference. I notice them, I liked them, I'm just not very observant. As long as they are there and not rocks I'm happy.

As said by the "greatest person ever."

Preference of size notwithstanding, you refer to more than a handful as a "waste". I would never call any part of big breasts a waste.

Well, "Why big breasts?" and "Why big fake tits?" are two entirely different questions, from where I'm sitting. As for the first one, one could cite a whole double-decker busload of reasons for, some of the 'instinctual' or 'genetic', some of them cultural, some of them which over-simplify and run the risk of reductionist talk, some of which get too complicatedly far afield from the simple, reduced matter at hand - which, in the plainest possible terms, may simply come down to: Men like tits, men put stock in size, therefore men put stock in the size of tits.

The second one's a bit easier, and a bit more elusive at the same titme (I almost corrected that typo, but it seemed to spoil the moment). It's obviously an extension, or evolution, of the first question, and its answers, but with a distinct cultural stamp from the place and time it came into its dominance: 80s, 90s U.S.A.
America at the time went through its most flagrant bout of consumerism since the invention of the modern economy, and all of America's defining characteristics were exploded to almost comical dimensions. They aren't hard to know, or to list, so while leaving out a few we'll stick to the most pertinent basics on them, too: Bigger, Better, Faster, Stronger. More, more efficient, more now, more when I say I want it. Everything got bigger. The Hummer saw its biggest models yet, the limousines got longer, the tits bot bigger, the concept of Supersizing came into being in a major way, Monster Trucks became huge, 'Pro Wrestling' hit it big, the list goes on and we all pretty much know what goes on it.
Take any fixation we already had, and it got stuck under the microscope until it burned in the heat of self-satire.
And that's probably the largest part of it, I'd guess.

On a less speculative and more observational note, though, there have been fake tits that I've said "Yes, dear." too, and emphatically. It has to be done on a woman with the right sense of her own physicality, so that she knows how much would help, and therefore it is largely about the proportions, as others have said, but also it seems to be hit and miss on which tits in general are really capable of being accented in that manner. I've seen no reliable standard: some tits look great, get that perky, just-can't-quit look that just won't quit, and some tits look like they're hideouts for all the lost Nazis that fled town after Adolf sprayed his brains.
It's really just a matter of circumstance, and the sensibilities of the woman in question, which makes for a fairly intimidating set of odds to rely on.

I wouldn't ever, even assuming all fake tits come out perfectly, lose my taste for tits like God made 'em, though.
Tits are one of the few remaining convincing arguments for the existence of a God in general, after all.

I post my thoughts on the subject.

There are two types of boobs that I like, ones that are just big enough that they bounce a little, and ones that are just small enough to fit in your hands. I dunno, I like smaller breasts more than big breasts.

I'm kind of an ass man myself.

Yeah, I don't discriminate against breasts, even if they are gigantic or fake (though I'm a little...uninterested? in them). Basically, the breasts I like are the ones I can touch.

i love bewbs, they are great and i like kissing them, holding them, and playing with them. ones that can fit in my hand are perfect, nothing overly large and i can work with small ones too. c size is probably ok for me.

You like Sez's, and no others can compare. You know it.

because the bigger the breasts the more milk inside. and obviously as we all know because Freud said so every man wants to suck his mother's tits.