New study.

Why is science spending money to figure this crap out?

The problem with studies like this: You're making the assumption based off of say, 1000 people. Unless they have studied every man that walks the earth, they cannot make the bold claim that EVERY man watches porn. Saying "the vast majority" watch porn would be a more accurate statement. It could be more accurate to say that all men have watched porn at some point in their life. The website itself doesn't seem very convincing and looks more like a joke to me.

I agree with that, to be honest. There's not a single chance they asked every single person on this planet. Even a representative sample wouldn't be enough to say that every single male watches porn.

Can pretty much throw this entire thing out the window if they're going to make a claim like that.

Additionally, "science" wasn't paying these researches to go out and find a male who hasn't watched porn, which is clear in the first paragraph. They couldn't find a male in their search to use in what was the actual point of the experiment.

Sorry, couldn't decide which was more appropriate.