Ron Paul WON NEVADA! :D

Ixzion · **Posted:** June 28th, 2008, 11:00 pm

Check out the good news!

Quote:

For those of you who REALLY WANT DESIRE AND NEED TO HAVE A FREE NATION....Nevada has set a landmark in the halls of history.....Today they have reconvened and remade the NEVADA GOP...and even as I am posting this they are electing delegates to the NATIONAL CONVENTION....(mostly, if not all, Ron Paul delegates) THIS WILL COUNT TOWARDS RON PAUL WINNING THE STATE OF NEVADA....which will allow them to NOMINATE HIM FROM THE FLOOR which is what this whole thing is really all about. Once he has a state that he legally wins(ie gets the majority of delegates for that state) He can then be nominated for President at the National Republican Convention. THIS MEANS THIS CAMPAIGN IS IN FULL GEAR!!!!!

Here is a bit of information on how they are doing this legally....

They did not have a quorum based on the old convention, but that convention has been invalidated due to rule breaking.(see below in bold) So now they have a new quorum with full attendance.Which means it is fully legal and shall withstand the scrutiny of legal challenges that may come!!!!

There is no "former" convention, the convention NEVER recessed. The convention has always been going on. Under RONR (10th. Ed.) sec. 20, p. 222, ln. 30,

"A recess is a short intermission in the assembly's proceedings, commonly only of a few minutes, which does not close the meeting and after which business will immediately be resumed at exactly the point where it was interrupted."

Thus, by definition, a recess can never be used to close a meeting. Under RONR, there are two types of recess: (1) a privileged motion to recess, requiring a majority vote, or (2) a unilateral recess being declared by the chair if it was provided for in the agenda or program. On April 26th, a RECESS was not provided for in the program or agenda (even though the agenda on April 26th. may have provided for ADJOURNMENT at a particular time, completely different from a recess).

Thus, the purported recess on April 26th. would have been valid ONLY if a motion to recess was made and seconded by the convention delegates, and the motion was voted on by a majority of delegates. Even then, however, the recess could not have been used to close the meeting.

For this reason shown above they now have a new quorum that is roughly 300 (a bit more) delegates. And now business is taking place with full legality and force of law behind them. WE THE PEOPLE SHALL AND WILL PREVAIL!!!!!

LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC OF THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.....now GO spread the word to every man, women and creature that we can still win Ron Paul the PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!!

With the delegates all in place, we can say that Ron Paul won Nevada! In addition, he can be nominated on the RNC floor for president!

I'm sure they'll contest this all the way to the convention, but seems like they've been strung up by the same rules they used to brush Paulites away. Heh.

ShadowFox1001 · **Posted:** June 29th, 2008, 1:23 am

Since I'm not a fan of Obama, I don't like this move very much. Ron Paul is more than likely not going to win, but his votes will probably take away from McCain. If that happens, Obama is sure to win, and I don't like that bastard.

Ixzion · **Posted:** June 29th, 2008, 11:51 am

McCain is going to be crushed like Mondale. The man is, inexplicably, parroting Bush's policies. Policies that only around 20% of Americans still approve of. How can you win if you're ignoring most of the population?

McCain has expliciitly said he wanted 100+ years of war. When most people are tired of war. It's insane.

I want to know what policies of his your approve of. Or you just hate Obama more?

And Osama--err, Obama is a socialist cunt. All he says is change, change, but change what? He doesn't say.

I do not understand how anyone can see the policies of people like Paul, and then view this as a bad thing. Shouldn't we be rooting for people like him to win?

ShadowFox1001 · **Posted:** June 29th, 2008, 7:00 pm

Mind you, I wouldn't mind him winning, but he more than likely won't. Because of that, I'm upset he's going to make McCain lose. I hate politicians, as I've stated quite a bit, I just dislike Obama way more. McCain would at least know how to deal with the wars and whatnot. Obama knows nothing of the military. Plus, I hate Socialism. POS government system.

AnonymousBo · **Posted:** June 30th, 2008, 1:42 am

If a candidate is good enough, nobody can "make" him lose unless they themselves are the winner.

ShadowFox1001 · **Posted:** June 30th, 2008, 10:20 am

Ron Paul can make McCain lose because he can take Republican votes away from him. He can take away from Obama, but it's highly unlikely that he'll pull more Obama fans than McCain.

AnonymousBo · **Posted:** June 30th, 2008, 8:31 pm

If McCain is good enough, then they won't vote for Ron Paul, they'll vote for McCain.

If McCain is good enough, then we don't have to worry about Ron Paul because Obama voters will vote for McCain.

McCain is not entitled to be president (neither is Obama).

They need to be good enough.

The point of winning an election is that you need to be good enough to win the vote of the people over ALL other candidates.

	It is currently February 20th, 2025, 9:41 pm
View unanswered posts \| View active topics

Ron Paul WON NEVADA! :D

Who is online