Is a terroist a revolutionist? In a way this is a very tricky question but both are very similar. The rest of the world doesn't agree what George Bush is doing but yet he's doing it for america. However the terroist are doing it for their religion and country. If you lived around that side of the world and saw some soldiers come in and shot some people who were defending themselves you would say thats a terroist. But since most of us live on this side of the world(America/Canada/Mexico/etc.) we would easily say that they are just terroist. But although a terroist just wants to change the world for themselves, while a revolutionist wants to change the world for the better which one could be labeled as easily a terroist? If this country went into war with it self and everyone from the west coast were labeled terroist while the east coast remains the dominant tyrant how would someone from the west coast and east coast label each other?

One man's terrorist is one man's revolutionary.

Consider the American Revolution. To Britain, Washington and gang where treasonous terrorists. To everyone in America today, they're heroes.

yeah, we still havent got you back for that one ¬¬